I would feel that comparing something thats a Ferrari to a live stock is a bit over stating the fact of "you can't afford, too bad you can't have." mentality. But its true, its life and too bad for those hobbyist who can't pay $9000 on a arowana. And I am one of those hobbyist that can't justify myself to spend that much.
There are seller of livestocks who would exchange it for you if the high high price you paid for the fish if it didn't turn out as expected quality. But when it is large enough to tell, specially for reds take least 5 years to reach full potential, would the same value of that grown up fish be compared to the new fish exchanged be the same? Say they refund your money 100% of what you paid for at 8-9", that price won't match your current fish which you had for 5 years. Unless the grown up fish is so bad that you can't sell for 50% of the original price. In the real world, does that happen often?
It is true you also get what you paid for, given the assumption that the product is really just that good. But my friends BMW that was bought at a big price started to have more and more trips to the mechanic. Not all product out there is made exactly to ratio between quality:high price.
Eken, I do not think it is the consumer's fault for not researching enough, in part or not, on a seller who is out being dishonest praying on the misinformed consumer. If the fish you paid for a really is a good deal and you weren't lucky enough for it to turn out a beauty, it shouldn't be wrong for the hobbyist to say the fish didn't turn out to be a beauty. And definitely support more comments made on stores thats dishonest.
The notion being unethical to complain about a business due to dishonestly fearing that business will die off is just ridiculous.
BMW & FERRARI, it's all just examples. Just because a friends BMW ends up at the mechanics more often than it is on the road does not necessarily mean he won't get a good resale value at trade in or re-sell day. Will your friend be telling prospective buyers how much problems he had with the car in the past? Of course not, he will tell that buyer that it was the best car he has ever owned, and maybe even hype the BMW name while he's at it. He' not going to risk loosing the sale.
I think were discussing a few topics here. Resale value on a fish that does not meet the hobbyist expectation is one thing and buying a guaranteed Arowana that the farm is selling with a 100% guarantee is another.
You will never really know until you purchase one. You are treated differently by the Aro farmer when you are in the upper buyer level. I guess it's like being that, "HIGH ROLLER' gambler in Vegas, there are alot of perks included if your one of them. If I was interested in a Premium Quality Arow, I'm sure he's also not going to show you the standard stocks available.
Protoxeno, if you can't fathom spending $9,000 C$ for a Premium Arowana, that is your opinion. There is more than a hand full of hobbyist's out there in the GTA willing to bid higher prices for that premium arow. Let's not hate them.
We were all brought together by the Arowana, that is what we all have in common.
The arowana is like any product in demand, if the selling price of the fish does not meet the farmers selling price by the end of the day, they will produce cheaper varieties or strains of the fish.
Goes back to economics my friend.
That is why they produced BANJARS or 1.5 red in the late 80's & early 90's.
Yes, I know greens were available, but the Reds were more appealing, so why not produce an affordable RED Arowana cross that the masses can buy.
As buyer's do your homework first. Find out or research where the Aro's are from, which farm, what country, etc?
The LFS owner will tell you what you want to hear when you are at his LFS drooling at that fish.
In this industry just like others, "MONEY TALK's BULL $&!T WALKS".
I could cover hormones and colour enhancements of the fish chromata's but that's another story.